Litigation

LITIGATION

Penkoski v. Bowser,​ ​1:20-cv-01519-TNM (D.D.C. 2020)

THE LITIGATION THAT CREATED THE STOP WOKE
ACT.Penkoski v. Bowser, 1:20-cv-01519-TNM (D.D.C. 2020)

Fox News Discusses Special Forces Of Liberty Litigation Against Mayor Bowser

Understanding Special Forces Of Liberty’s Litigation Against Mayor Bowser

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

FIRST MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY PASTOR PENKOSKI

SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY TEX CHRISTOPHER

THIRD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY SEVIER

MAYOR BOWER’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION

AFFIDAVIT OF A COALITION OF MULTI-RACIAL PASTORS


HE LITIGATION THAT CREATED THE SAVE OUR CHILDREN ACT (SOCA).

Sevier v. Googleet. al., 15-5345 (6th Cir. 2016)

SEVIER’S APPELLANT BRIEF

GOOGLE’S APPELLEE BRIEF

SEVIER’S REPLY BRIEF


LEGAL TALKING POINTS FOR ATTORNEYS GENERAL

HISTORY OF THE LAW LEADING UP TO THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND CHILD EXPLOITATION PREVENT ACT


Sevier v. Herbert et. al,2:16-cv-00386 (Utah 2016)

COMPLAINT

WASHINGTON TIMES ARTICLE


Controlling Legal Opinions Supporting The Constitutionality Of SOCA.

Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union,​ 542 U.S. 656 (2004)

U.S. Supreme Court held that filters are the least restrictive means, and stated “Congress undoubtedly may act to encourage the use of filters…. It could also take steps to promote their development by industry, and their use by parent.



Ginsberg v. New York,​ 390 U.S. 629 (1968)

The U.S. Supreme Court held that the physical display statute which requires “physical” bricks and mortar stores place “physical” pornography behind a “physical” bind rack Constitutional as the “least restrictive means.” Therefore, a “digital” filter law, like SOCA, that requires Internet-enabled devices to put “digital” pornography behind a “digital” blinder rack by default is also Constitutional valid on the same basis exact legal basis.

Combs v. Texas Entertainment Association​, et al., 347 S.W.3d 277 (Sup. Ct. Tex. 2011)

The Texas Supreme Court upheld a statute that imposes a $5 strip club admission fee that is remitted back to the state to go to a special grant fund for the benefit of government and non-government groups that are working to uphold community standards of decency.

The statute was deemed to be constitutional because the fee is nominal and because the fee does not go to the general fund but goes towards helping the state fulfill a compelling state interest to uphold community standards of decency.


THE LITIGATION THAT CREATED THE SCHOOL ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE ACT (SECA)
Quinlan v. HHS, 1:20-cv-02261-TNM (D.D.C. 2020) a case to overrule Bostic, Obergefell, and Windsor. 

FIRST MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION:

SECOND MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION:

AFFIDAVIT OF A COALITION OF THEOLOGIANS AND PASTORS:

MEDICAL EXPERT TESTIMONY:
Dr. Michelle Cretella
Dr. Tara King:

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ibyjiwwekmszt87/District%20of%20Columbia%20live%20database.pdf?dl=0


THE LITIGATION THAT CREATED THE LIFE APPROPRIATION ACT LITIGATION

California v. HHS,​ 3:19-cv-01184 (2019)

MOTION TO INTERVENE


LITIGATION THAT CREATED THE SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTABLE CENSORSHIP ACT (THE SMAC ACT):

Sevier et. al. v. Garland et. al., 1:21-cv-22577 (SDFL July 20, 2021)

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT:
 https://www.dropbox.com/s/vrcjoxx3aygq5z1/Complaint%20De%20Facto%20Attorneys%20General%20v.%20Garland%20%287%29.pdf?dl=0

AMICUS BRIEF IN TRUMP V. TWITTER: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uydfyrqo0dygu30/Trump%20amicus%20consolidated%20brief%20final.pdf?dl=0


Pickup et. al. v. Biden, 1:22-cv-00859-TNM (D.D.C. 2022)
Lawsuit preemptively challenging the Equality Act. 

Amended Complaint: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ayfpmui0bowbeh3/First%20Amended%20Complaint%20Equality%20Act%20And%20Women_s%20Health%20Protection%20Act%20lawsuit.pdf?dl=0

Motion For Summary Judgment: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zknl9yyoyx92wll/Official%20Memorandum%20In%20Support%20of%20the%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf?dl=0


Freedom Realized LIVE w/ Stephen Black | 4-15-2022 | Chris Sevier, Esq – Discussing the Equality Act lawsuit.